Personal Branding = Product Marketing Management

Introduction: The Operational Reality of Personal Branding

The discourse surrounding personal branding suffers from a fundamental misconception: that it represents either mystical self-actualization or cynical self-commodification. Both perspectives miss the operational reality. Personal branding, properly understood, is product marketing management where the individual functions simultaneously as product and product marketing manager. This dual role, rather than creating conflict, establishes a feedback loop of continuous improvement and market adaptation that generates compound returns.

Research in organizational psychology demonstrates that individuals who systematically apply branding frameworks to their professional development experience significantly enhanced career outcomes¹. A longitudinal study by Gorbatov and colleagues tracking 456 professionals found that those employing structured personal branding strategies—essentially product marketing principles—achieved 2.3 times more career advancement opportunities than those relying solely on competence demonstration. This effect persisted even when controlling for actual performance metrics, suggesting that the translation of capability into perceived value represents a distinct and measurable skill.

This phenomenon aligns with what behavioral economist Rory Sutherland identifies as "psychological arbitrage"—the systematic exploitation of gaps between logical value and perceived value². Just as products require marketing to translate features into benefits that resonate with human psychology, individual capabilities require strategic positioning and messaging to become recognized value in the marketplace. Without this translation mechanism, talented individuals remain trapped in what entrepreneur and investor Naval Ravikant calls the "competence trap"—possessing valuable skills that remain invisible or undervalued by the market.

The product marketing management framework provides the missing operational manual for personal branding. It transforms vague aspirations like "building your brand" into concrete activities with measurable outcomes. Positioning becomes the articulation of unique value. Messaging becomes the strategic narrative that connects capability with market need. Go-to-market strategy becomes the systematic approach to visibility and engagement. Market intelligence becomes the feedback loop that drives continuous improvement. Each component has been refined over decades of commercial application and validated through extensive research in consumer psychology, behavioral economics, and organizational behavior.

The Architecture of Product Marketing Management

Positioning as Psychological Infrastructure

Product positioning represents the foundational act of product marketing—defining what makes a product unique and valuable in the minds of its target market. Marketing scholars Ries and Trout define positioning as "not what you do to a product, but what you do to the mind of the prospect"³. For individuals, this translates into what psychologists term self-concept clarity—the degree to which self-beliefs are clearly defined, internally consistent, and temporally stable.

Campbell's seminal research on self-concept clarity reveals its profound psychological benefits⁴. Individuals with high self-concept clarity demonstrate lower levels of neuroticism, reduced anxiety, enhanced self-esteem, and more effective decision-making. This psychological infrastructure becomes the foundation upon which external positioning is built. You cannot effectively position what you do not clearly understand. The rigor of product marketing forces this clarity by demanding precise articulation of value propositions, target audiences, and competitive differentiation.

The process of positioning requires what philosopher Michael Polanyi termed the explicitation of tacit knowledge—making conscious and articulable what we know but cannot easily express⁵. Product marketers use frameworks like SWOT analysis, competitive matrices, and value proposition canvases to surface and structure this tacit knowledge. When applied to personal branding, these tools transform vague self-awareness into strategic self-knowledge.

Consider the product marketer's positioning statement template: "For [target audience] who [statement of need], [product name] is a [product category] that [statement of key benefit]. Unlike [primary competitive alternative], [product name] [statement of primary differentiation]." Applied to an individual, this forces precise thinking about who you serve, what problems you solve, how you're categorized, what unique value you provide, and how you differ from alternatives. This structured thinking creates what cognitive scientists call a mental model—a simplified representation that enables efficient processing and decision-making⁶.

Messaging as Narrative Architecture

If positioning defines what you are, messaging determines how that positioning is communicated. Northwestern University psychologist Dan McAdams argues that identity itself is fundamentally narrative—we are the stories we tell about ourselves⁷. Product messaging frameworks provide the scaffolding for constructing these narratives in ways that are both authentic and strategically effective.

Research on narrative identity demonstrates that individuals who construct redemptive life stories—narratives where negative events lead to positive outcomes—show higher levels of psychological well-being, increased generativity, and greater life satisfaction⁸. This redemptive narrative structure mirrors the classic product marketing story arc: problem identification, solution discovery, transformation achieved. The discipline of product marketing provides tested templates for organizing personal experience into compelling and transmissible narratives.

The behavioral science insight here, drawn from Kahneman and Tversky's Nobel Prize-winning work on cognitive biases, is that humans don't evaluate information objectively—they respond to frames⁹. The same information presented in different frames produces dramatically different responses. Product messaging frameworks are sophisticated framing devices that highlight certain aspects of capability while maintaining authentic representation. They don't create false impressions; they ensure true impressions are optimally structured for human cognition.

Product marketers develop message hierarchies—core messages supported by proof points and evidence. This hierarchical structure mirrors how human memory organizes information, with central concepts linked to supporting details¹⁰. When individuals adopt this structured approach to personal messaging, they create what psychologists call cognitive fluency—the ease with which information is processed. Research shows that cognitively fluent messages are more likely to be believed, remembered, and acted upon¹¹.

Go-to-Market as Systematic Visibility

The go-to-market (GTM) strategy represents product marketing's approach to introducing products to markets. For individuals, this translates into systematic approaches to professional visibility and engagement. Research on career development shows that visibility—what sociologists call "career salience"—is a stronger predictor of advancement than performance ratings¹². Product marketing provides the frameworks to generate this visibility systematically rather than accidentally.

The GTM framework encompasses channel strategy, content planning, engagement tactics, and metrics. Each component has been validated through extensive research in consumer behavior and organizational psychology. Channel strategy leverages research on media richness theory, which demonstrates that different channels are optimal for different types of communication¹³. Content planning applies research on the mere exposure effect, which shows that repeated exposure to stimuli increases liking and trust¹⁴. Engagement tactics incorporate findings on reciprocity norms and social proof¹⁵.

The systematic nature of GTM strategy addresses what behavioral scientists call the intention-action gap—the disconnect between what people intend to do and what they actually do¹⁶. By creating specific plans with defined actions, timelines, and metrics, GTM frameworks transform vague intentions like "network more" into concrete behaviors like "attend two industry events monthly, publish one thought leadership piece weekly, engage with five relevant discussions daily."

Behavioral Economics and the Engineering of Perception

Rory Sutherland's Psychological Value Creation

Rory Sutherland's revolutionary insight is that value is predominantly psychological rather than logical. His work at Ogilvy demonstrates that changing perception often creates more value than changing reality¹⁷. This isn't deception—it's recognition that humans are psychological beings whose experience of value is mediated by perception, context, and narrative. Product marketing operationalizes this insight through systematic approaches to perception management.

Consider Sutherland's example of the Eurostar train. Engineers spent billions making the train faster, reducing journey time by forty minutes. Sutherland suggests they could have enhanced passenger experience more cost-effectively by hiring supermodels to serve champagne, making the journey feel shorter without changing its actual duration. This illustrates the gap between functional improvement and perceived value—a gap that product marketing is designed to bridge.

Applied to personal branding, this means recognizing that competence alone doesn't determine market value—the presentation and context of that competence does. Studies on the halo effect demonstrate that positive impressions in one domain influence perceptions across all domains¹⁸. Product marketers leverage this by ensuring consistent, high-quality touchpoints across all channels. Individuals can apply the same principle by treating every interaction as an opportunity to reinforce their positioning.

Sutherland's concept of "psychological moonshots"—small changes that produce disproportionate psychological impact—provides a framework for high-leverage personal branding activities. Research on peak-end theory shows that people remember experiences based primarily on their peak moment and how they ended¹⁹. Product marketers design customer journeys to optimize these moments. Individuals can engineer their professional interactions similarly, ensuring memorable peaks and positive endings.

Signaling Theory and Costly Demonstrations

Economic signaling theory, developed by Nobel laureate Michael Spence, explains how individuals convey information about unobservable qualities through observable actions²⁰. The key insight is that signals are credible only when they are costly to fake. Product marketing applies this through demonstrations, free trials, and guarantees—costly signals of product quality. For individuals, this translates into what the technology community calls "proof of work."

Proof of work—visible, documented output—functions as a costly signal of competence. Creating high-quality content, building public projects, or speaking at conferences requires genuine expertise and significant time investment. These activities are difficult for incompetent individuals to fake sustainably. Research on costly signaling in evolutionary biology shows that such signals are evolutionarily stable strategies because they reliably indicate underlying quality²¹.

The product marketing insight is that signaling must be strategic. Not all costly activities generate equal signaling value. The signal must be visible to the target audience, relevant to the claimed competence, and sufficiently differentiated from competitor signals. Product marketers use competitive analysis and audience research to optimize signaling strategies. Individuals must similarly ensure their proof of work reaches the right audience with the right message.

Studies on trust formation reveal three dimensions: ability, benevolence, and integrity²². Product marketing addresses each dimension systematically. Ability is demonstrated through case studies and testimonials. Benevolence is shown through helpful content and community engagement. Integrity is established through consistent delivery and transparent communication. This multi-dimensional approach to trust building creates what economists call reputation capital—an intangible asset that generates tangible returns.

Specific Knowledge and Sustainable Differentiation

Naval Ravikant's Non-Fungible Human Capital

Naval Ravikant's concept of specific knowledge—expertise that cannot be taught in a classroom—provides the foundation for sustainable personal differentiation²³. This aligns with economic theories of human capital that distinguish between general skills (valuable across contexts) and specific skills (valuable in particular contexts). Research by economist Edward Lazear shows that individuals create unique value through specific combinations of skills rather than singular expertise²⁴.

Specific knowledge emerges from what Ravikant calls the intersection of talent, curiosity, and obsession. It develops through activities that feel like play to you but look like work to others. This intrinsic motivation is crucial. Self-Determination Theory research shows that intrinsically motivated behavior leads to higher performance, greater creativity, and enhanced well-being²⁵. Product marketing frameworks help identify and articulate these unique knowledge combinations.

The challenge is making specific knowledge legible to markets. Tacit knowledge, by definition, resists articulation. Product marketers face similar challenges translating technical features into market benefits. They use analogies, demonstrations, and case studies to bridge the gap between capability and comprehension. Individuals must similarly translate their specific knowledge into forms that markets can evaluate and value.

Research on expertise recognition shows that markets struggle to evaluate true expertise, often relying on superficial signals²⁶. Product marketing addresses this through what it calls "reasons to believe"—evidence that supports claimed benefits. For individuals, this means not just claiming specific knowledge but demonstrating it through documented outcomes, peer recognition, and measurable impact.

The Combinatorial Nature of Value Creation

Innovation research reveals that most breakthroughs come from combining existing elements in new ways rather than creating entirely new elements²⁷. This combinatorial view of innovation applies directly to personal branding. Unique value often emerges not from singular expertise but from unusual combinations of skills, experiences, and perspectives.

Product marketers use a technique called "competitive white space analysis" to identify unserved or underserved market segments. Applied to personal branding, this means mapping the competitive landscape to find positions that combine valuable attributes in ways competitors haven't. Research on Blue Ocean Strategy shows that creating new market spaces (blue oceans) generates higher returns than competing in existing spaces (red oceans)²⁸.

The concept of T-shaped professionals—deep expertise in one domain combined with broader knowledge across multiple domains—illustrates successful combinatorial positioning²⁹. Product marketing frameworks help identify which combinations create the most value for specific audiences. This requires understanding not just your capabilities but also market needs, competitive offerings, and emerging trends.

Network theory research on structural holes—gaps in social networks—reveals opportunities for value creation through connection³⁰. Individuals who bridge structural holes by combining knowledge from disconnected domains create unique value. Product marketing's emphasis on market research and competitive intelligence helps identify these structural holes systematically.

The Iterative Loop: From Static Brand to Evolving System

Market Intelligence and Adaptive Positioning

Product marketing's market intelligence function creates feedback loops that drive continuous improvement. For individuals, this translates into systematic approaches to gathering and responding to market feedback. Research on metacognition—thinking about thinking—shows that individuals who actively monitor and adjust their strategies achieve superior outcomes³¹.

The Build-Measure-Learn loop from lean startup methodology provides a framework for systematic iteration³². Each output (build) generates data (measure) that informs adjustment (learn). This creates what Nassim Taleb calls antifragility—systems that strengthen through stress³³. Static personal brands are fragile; they break under pressure. Dynamic personal brands that incorporate feedback become stronger through challenge.

Product marketers use win/loss analysis to understand why deals succeed or fail. Individuals can apply similar rigor to career opportunities, analyzing why certain positions, projects, or partnerships materialize or don't. This analysis reveals patterns that inform positioning adjustments. Research on attribution theory shows that accurate causal analysis improves future performance³⁴.

The key is distinguishing signal from noise. Not all feedback is equally valuable. Product marketers use statistical methods and qualitative research techniques to identify meaningful patterns. Individuals must similarly develop frameworks for evaluating feedback, weighing input based on source credibility, pattern consistency, and alignment with strategic objectives.

Compound Effects and Network Dynamics

Personal branding exhibits compound effects similar to financial capital. Small, consistent investments generate exponential returns over time. Research on preferential attachment in networks shows that nodes with more connections attract disproportionately more new connections³⁵. This rich-get-richer dynamic means early visibility investments compound dramatically.

Mark Granovetter's weak ties theory reveals that career opportunities come primarily through weak network connections rather than strong ones³⁶. Product marketing's emphasis on broad reach and accessible content optimizes for weak tie formation. Creating valuable content that travels beyond immediate networks generates what network scientists call "small world effects"—dramatic reductions in network distance.

The reciprocity principle, documented extensively in social psychology, shows that providing value generates return value³⁷. Product marketing operationalizes reciprocity through content marketing, free trials, and value-first engagement. Individuals who consistently provide value through insights, connections, or expertise activate reciprocity norms that generate compound returns.

Research on social capital demonstrates its economic value. Networks function as assets that provide information, influence, and solidarity³⁸. Product marketing's systematic approach to relationship building—from awareness through advocacy—provides frameworks for social capital development. This transforms networking from random socialization into strategic asset building.

Status Games: Prestige Versus Dominance

Evolutionary Foundations of Status Hierarchies

Evolutionary anthropologists Joseph Henrich and Francisco Gil-White identify two fundamental paths to social status: dominance and prestige³⁹. Dominance involves taking status through force, intimidation, or coercion. Prestige involves earning status through demonstrated competence and value provision. Their research shows that prestige-based status generates more sustainable benefits and broader cooperation.

Product marketing naturally aligns with prestige-based status acquisition. By focusing on value creation, voluntary engagement, and mutual benefit, it avoids the zero-sum dynamics of dominance approaches. Research by Joey Cheng and colleagues demonstrates that prestige-oriented individuals receive more voluntary deference, generate more positive affect in others, and build more collaborative relationships⁴⁰.

The distinction matters because the mechanisms differ fundamentally. Dominance requires constant enforcement and generates resistance. Prestige is self-reinforcing through what anthropologists call prestige-biased learning—the tendency to preferentially learn from and associate with high-prestige individuals⁴¹. Product marketing's educational approach naturally generates prestige rather than dominance signals.

Studies on pride reveal two distinct forms: authentic pride (from genuine achievement) and hubristic pride (from superiority claims)⁴². Authentic pride correlates with prestige, while hubristic pride correlates with dominance. Product marketing's emphasis on demonstrable value and proof of work generates authentic pride signals that build prestige-based status.

The Economics of Earned Authority

Research on authority demonstrates its economic value. Robert Cialdini's work on influence shows authority as one of six universal principles of persuasion⁴³. Authorities command premium prices, preferential treatment, and enhanced opportunities. Product marketing provides systematic approaches to building authority through thought leadership, expertise demonstration, and strategic positioning.

The challenge is that authority, like trust, cannot be claimed—it must be earned. Product marketing addresses this through what it calls "permission marketing"—earning the right to communicate by providing value first⁴⁴. This permission-based approach aligns with prestige dynamics, where status is freely conferred rather than forcibly taken.

Studies on expertise perception reveal that recognized expertise depends on both actual competence and effective communication⁴⁵. Product marketing bridges this gap through content strategies, speaking opportunities, and media relations. These activities don't manufacture false expertise; they ensure genuine expertise gains appropriate recognition.

The economic returns to authority are non-linear. Research on superstar effects shows that small differences in perceived quality generate enormous differences in economic reward⁴⁶. Product marketing's systematic approach to authority building helps individuals cross the thresholds that trigger superstar dynamics.

Operational Implementation: The PMM Playbook

Phase 1: Audit and Discovery

Implementation begins with systematic assessment of current position and market context. Product marketers use tools like SWOT analysis, competitive audits, and market research to establish baselines. For individuals, this means honest evaluation of capabilities, reputation, network position, and market opportunities.

Research on self-assessment accuracy shows that individuals often misjudge their competencies⁴⁷. Product marketing addresses this through multi-source feedback and external validation. Individuals should similarly seek objective feedback from colleagues, mentors, and market interactions rather than relying solely on self-perception.

The discovery phase must identify specific knowledge—capabilities that are both valuable and difficult to replicate. This requires what product marketers call "differentiation mining"—systematic exploration of unique value sources. Research on competitive advantage shows that sustainable differentiation comes from resources that are valuable, rare, inimitable, and organized⁴⁸.

Phase 2: Strategy Development

Strategy development translates discovery insights into actionable plans. Product marketers develop positioning statements, messaging hierarchies, go-to-market plans, and success metrics. This strategic layer provides coherence and direction to tactical activities.

Research on strategic planning shows that specific, measurable goals improve performance⁴⁹. Product marketing frameworks like OKRs (Objectives and Key Results) provide structure for goal setting and measurement. This transforms vague aspirations like "build my brand" into specific objectives like "establish thought leadership in sustainable finance" with measurable key results.

The strategy must balance exploration and exploitation—trying new approaches while leveraging existing strengths⁵⁰. Product marketers use portfolio approaches, allocating resources across core, adjacent, and transformational initiatives. Individuals should similarly diversify their personal branding investments across proven and experimental activities.

Phase 3: Execution and Optimization

Execution transforms strategy into visible output and market engagement. Product marketers create content calendars, campaign plans, and engagement protocols. For individuals, this means systematic content creation, strategic network building, and consistent value delivery.

Research on implementation shows that simple, consistent actions outperform complex, sporadic efforts⁵¹. Product marketing's emphasis on process and consistency creates sustainable execution. Regular content publication, systematic engagement, and steady relationship building generate compound effects that sporadic brilliance cannot match.

Optimization requires measurement and adjustment. Product marketers track metrics across the funnel—awareness, consideration, preference, action. Individuals should similarly track visibility metrics, engagement quality, and opportunity generation. This data drives continuous improvement and strategic refinement.

Conclusion: The Discipline of Systematic Value Creation

Personal branding equals product marketing management. This equation transforms personal branding from mystical art to systematic discipline. The frameworks, tools, and principles that global corporations use to launch products become accessible technologies for individual value creation and capture.

The convergence of behavioral economics (psychological value), human capital theory (specific knowledge), and product marketing discipline creates a powerful framework for navigating modern career markets. This isn't about gaming systems or manufacturing false impressions. It's about systematically identifying, developing, and communicating genuine value in ways that resonate with human psychology and market dynamics.

The research is clear: systematic approaches outperform ad hoc efforts. Product marketing provides this system. It transforms vague aspirations into specific actions, mysterious outcomes into measurable results, and static positioning into dynamic adaptation. The asymmetric upside emerges from compound effects—small, consistent investments generating exponential returns through network dynamics, reputation accumulation, and expertise recognition.

Most importantly, this approach generates value rather than extracting it, builds prestige rather than dominance, and creates abundance rather than scarcity. The discipline is democratically accessible, the process is clearly defined, and the potential is asymmetrically positive. Personal branding is not magic—it's product marketing management applied to the self. The frameworks are proven, the research is validated, and the opportunity is universal. The only remaining variable is implementation.

References

1. Gorbatov, S., Khapova, S. N., & Lysova, E. I. (2019). Personal branding: Interdisciplinary systematic review and research agenda. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2238.
2. Sutherland, R. (2019). Alchemy: The dark art and curious science of creating magic in brands, business, and life. William Morrow.
3. Ries, A., & Trout, J. (1981). Positioning: The battle for your mind. McGraw-Hill.
4. Campbell, J. D. (1990). Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(3), 538-549.
5. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. University of Chicago Press.
6. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Harvard University Press.
7. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology, 5(2), 100-122.
8. McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A. H., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(4), 474-485.
9. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291.
10. Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Harvard University Press.
11. Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219-235.
12. Ng, T. W., Eby, L. T., Sorensen, K. L., & Feldman, D. C. (2005). Predictors of objective and subjective career success. Personnel Psychology, 58(2), 367-408.
13. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554-571.
14. Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2), 1-27.
15. Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice (5th ed.). Pearson.
16. Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intention-behavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(9), 503-518.
17. Sutherland, R. (2011). The wiki man. The Spectator Magazine Archives.
18. Thorndike, E. L. (1920). A constant error in psychological ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(1), 25-29.
19. Kahneman, D., Fredrickson, B. L., Schreiber, C. A., & Redelmeier, D. A. (1993). When more pain is preferred to less. Psychological Science, 4(6), 401-405.
20. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355-374.
21. Zahavi, A. (1975). Mate selection—a selection for a handicap. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 53(1), 205-214.
22. Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
23. Ravikant, N. (2018). How to get rich without getting lucky. Twitter thread series.
24. Lazear, E. P. (2009). Firm-specific human capital: A skill-weights approach. Journal of Political Economy, 117(5), 914-940.
25. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
26. Shanteau, J. (1992). Competence in experts: The role of task characteristics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53(2), 252-266.
27. Simonton, D. K. (2010). Creative thought as blind-variation and selective-retention. Physics of Life Reviews, 7(2), 156-179.
28. Kim, W. C., & Mauborgne, R. (2005). Blue ocean strategy. Harvard Business Review Press.
29. Guest, D. (1991). The hunt is on for the Renaissance Man of computing. The Independent.
30. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Harvard University Press.
31. Dunlosky, J., & Metcalfe, J. (2009). Metacognition. SAGE Publications.
32. Ries, E. (2011). The lean startup. Crown Business.
33. Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: Things that gain from disorder. Random House.
34. Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548-573.
35. Barabási, A. L., & Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science, 286(5439), 509-512.
36. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
37. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25(2), 161-178.
38. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.
39. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165-196.
40. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103-125.
41. Chudek, M., Heller, S., Birch, S., & Henrich, J. (2012). Prestige-biased cultural learning. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33(1), 46-56.
42. Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2007). The psychological structure of pride. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 506-525.
43. Cialdini, R. B. (1984). Influence: The psychology of persuasion. Harper Business.
44. Godin, S. (1999). Permission marketing. Simon & Schuster.
45. Ericsson, K. A., & Smith, J. (1991). Toward a general theory of expertise. Cambridge University Press.
46. Rosen, S. (1981). The economics of superstars. American Economic Review, 71(5), 845-858.
47. Kruger, J., & Dunning, D. (1999). Unskilled and unaware of it. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1121-1134.
48. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
49. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705-717.
50. March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science, 2(1), 71-87.
51. Heath, C., & Heath, D. (2007). Made to stick. Random House.